news from the intersection of branding & technology

Posts Tagged ‘Wall Street Journal’

Obamacare – Where brand and technology collide

In brand-building on November 20, 2013 at 9:24 pm
English: President Barack Obama's signature on...

English: President Barack Obama’s signature on the health insurance reform bill at the White House, March 23, 2010. The President signed the bill with 22 different pens. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

by Robert Liljenwall

One doesn’t have to be a brain surgeon to figure out that the Obamacare brand and its technology (health have fallen on bad times. We at BTN have not seen any collision this colossal in scope and damage that has affected so many millions as the Obamacare rollout. The brand – Obamacare, is really a mixed bag between President Obama and his signature program, the Affordable Care Act – but as we all know, President Obama owns it now, and for a long time since its passage in 2010, it was a plus. Now, it has become an albatross around President Obama and the Democratic Party – at least for 12 Democratic senators up for re-election next year.

Even as we write this story, former President Bill Clinton bluntly chimed in that “Obama should live up to his promise to Americans that if they like their health plans, they can keep them.” For the record, Clinton didn’t think Obama’s apology “cut it.”

From a brand point of view, Obamacare – if it is ultimately successful – will be the President’s greatest legacy – a brand that will live positively forever. Who knows how we will refer to the Affordable Care Act in 10 years or 40 years, as we do with Social Security or Medicare? But if it doesn’t fare well, then everyone, including Democrats, will run as fast as they can from that brand. And one journalist commented on Bill Clinton’s rebuke of Obama is that he is laying the groundwork for Hillary in 2016 – “it isn’t her program!”

So how does one measure the Obamacare brand, and how is it linked to the President? On the surface, the brand linkage between the ACA and Obama is a natural extension of the President’s own brand. Obama, a brand by itself, is a strong, easy-to-pronounce six-letter word that represents one of the most powerful persons in the world – and comes with all of the attendant prestige and power of the office. So it was a natural brand extension – and it sounds good – O-ba-ma-care. Rolls right off your tongue and ear. It reads well, too. And focus groups would have probably given this symbolic brand name a thumbs-up. “Works for me …” one Democrat pollster said. So, it is difficult to “cut off” the Obama brand from the public perception of Obamacare, when it is actually the Affordable Care Act.

Latest Polls measure brand strength

As a “brand,” Obamacare poll numbers indicate that a majority – 53 percent – of likely voters are unfavorable toward the ACA and only 43 percent are favorable. (Rasmussen)  But the numbers have been fluid since the near-collapse of the website and attendant confusion on how and when the site will be fixed. In some states, like Virginia, poll numbers by CNN indicated that 48 percent viewed the ACA favorably and 50 percent viewed it unfavorably.

But in looking at the “Obama” brand by itself – the latest Wall Street Journal–NBC poll, shows that only 41 percent in late October viewed Obama in a positive light, with 45 percent holding a negative impression. Surely, his falling poll numbers have something to do with the Obamacare rollout.

A more fluid measure of Obama’s standing is the public assessment of his performance in office is also sinking:  Only 42 percent approved of the job he was doing, a low in the President’s tracking on the Wall Street Journal – NBC since he took office. When you compare these poll numbers with both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton at a similar time in their presidency, they had a 58 percent and 62 percent approval rating respectively. Bush (W) had a low of 36 percent at the same time – after Katrina hit.

So, how does Obama get back a positive brand perception?  According to former Clinton White House adviser Chris Lahane, second-term presidents all face a decline in their second term which “effectively makes them lame ducks.” But other Democratic leaders beside Clinton state that Obama “over promised” what the public was going to get with the new health care law. With the continuing confusion and technology fiasco at hand and the top news story on every newscast every day, Obama can only improve his brand by ‘fixing the website’ and making good on his promises, as Clinton has urged. He needs to build back trust with the public.

Of course, political brands are most vulnerable to personality and performance issues, and because Obama pushed so hard to get the bill passed and lauded its benefits (“… you can keep your doctor” … and “keep your plan if you like it”) have just ‘done him in in our opinion, no matter how hard you try to back-track with even legitimate reasons. The public, it seems, has already voted on this for now … and we await the looming Dec. 1 fix-it-deadline. – RJL

The Lemon Award

In Lemon Award on July 20, 2011 at 9:58 am

Awarded to the most deserving brand

By Robert Liljenwall
With this piece we start a new regular feature for BrandTech News, in which our Brand Editor puts the squeeze on Brands that have recently soured. News Corp. is BrandTech News’ first recipient of the Lemon Award for the company that has most tarnished its brand through missteps, bad behavior, or just plain stupidity.
Revelations of alleged mass hacking of just about everybody’s email and voicemails plus bribery of police officials by News Corp’s News of the World tabloid can best be described as a massive tsunami of brand destruction that is still sweeping across the UK. Who knows where this will end? Second only to Disney as the world’s largest media company, the entire Rupert Murdoch empire is on the brink of tumbling off its global pedestal—just like Humpty Dumpty. Except Humpty Dumpty was never threatened with jail, let alone arrested. But already, News Corp has trashed its venerable 168-year old News of the World — shut down, gone. Its powerful chief, Rebekah Brooks, has been arrested, with more to follow.
Started long before you were born in 1843, the News of the World (NotW) was the biggest English language newspaper in the world. It was purchased by Murdoch in 1969, but the immense and quick execution of the entire NotW staff of 200 goes down as one of the greatest brand implosions of all time. But, wait there’s more. Also, the Police Commissioner of London has now resigned, although he admits to no wrong doing.
Is this News Corp’s BrandGate? Obviously, there is smoke from News Corp’s chimney…..News Corp has already withdrawn its bid for control of British Sky Broadcasting’s (BSkyB) massive satellite network …and while observers mused if the new Hacking Plague would spread to the company’s prime US properties….it already has with the resignation of Les Hinton, who resigned as the publisher of The Wall Street Journal (he had previously served as publisher for NotW). Does the glove fit here, too?
All in all, News Corp’s total market value has lost over $6 billion in value since July 1 when the scandal first broke (more than 13%)…..and last week, the company published a letter signed personally by Rupert Murdoch….”We are sorry.” He is making the rounds to get anyone to listen to his version of why he is so sorry.
Will it work? The essence of any brand is its commitment to core values and how it is perceived by its customers. Do they trust you? Obviously, there are chinks in Rupert’s armor. But it’s too early to tell what the long-term effects will be on Murdoch’s News Corp brand. He has managed to build strong brands in the newspaper business with The London Times and Wall Street Journal. And for his US holdings of Fox News, Fox Television, and 20th Century Fox Studios – he has significant brand equity despite dumping the UK newspaper that was a moneymaker and a huge public opinion influencer for 168 years. You have to be pretty desperate to do that.
This 80-year old Murdoch is not going quietly into the night … he is slashing, firing, and plunging into his brands with ever-quickening speed to stop the bleeding. His ace in the hole: Strong media he still owns. There is an old saying in the newspaper business: “You never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel.” But in these days of electronic media, he may not have enough ink. More to follow. RJL
[image courtesy of Ambro,]

  • Six lessons from News Corp testimonies before parliament (
  • Phone Hacking: Rupert Murdoch tells staff News Corp will emerge ‘stronger’ (
  • The Murdochs must stop spinning and resign over the phone-hacking scandal | Robert Greenwald (
  • News Corp to emerge ‘a stronger company’: Murdoch – AFP (
  • Cameron testifies on hacking scandal ties (
%d bloggers like this: